Evaluation of the early use of norepinephrine in major abdominal surgery on medical and surgical postoperative complications: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (EPON STUDY).

BACKGROUND: Post-induction anaesthesia often promotes intraoperative hypotension (IOH) that can worsen postoperative outcomes. This study aims to assess the benefit of norepinephrine versus ephedrine at the induction of anaesthesia to prevent postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery by preventing IOH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The EPON STUDY is a prospective single-centre randomised controlled trial with the planned inclusion of 500 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery at the Amiens University Hospital. The inclusion criteria are patients aged over 50 years weighing more than 50 kg with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of ≥2 undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients are allocated either to the intervention group (n=250) or the standard group (n=250). In the intervention group, the prevention of post-induction IOH is performed with norepinephrine (dilution to 0.016 mg/mL) using an electric syringe pump at a rate of 0.48 mg/h (30 mL/h) from the start of anaesthesia and then titrated to achieve the haemodynamic target. In the control group, the prevention of post-induction IOH is performed with manual titration of ephedrine, with a maximal dose of 30 mg, followed by perfusion with norepinephrine. In both groups, the haemodynamic target to maintain is a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm Hg or 70 mm Hg for patients with a medical history of hypertension. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. The primary outcome is the Clavien-Dindo score assessed up to 30 days postoperatively. The secondary endpoints are the length of hospital stay and length of stay in an intensive care unit/postoperative care unit; postoperative renal function; postoperative cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, haematological and infectious complications at 1 month; and volume of intraoperative vascular filling and mortality at 1 month. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the committee of protection of the persons of Ile de France in May 2021 (number 21 05 41). The authors will be involved in disseminating the research findings (through attending conferences and co-authoring papers). The results of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05276596.

Exploration of factors affecting hemodynamic stability following pheochromocytoma resection - cohort study.

Purpose: Surgery is the only way to cure pheochromocytoma; however, postoperative hemodynamic instability is one of the main causes of serious complications and even death. This study's findings provide some guidance for improved clinical management. Patients and methods: This study was to investigate the factors leading to postoperative hemodynamic instability in the postoperative pathology indicated pheochromocytoma from May 2016 to May 2022. They were divided into two groups according to whether vasoactive drugs were used for a median number of days or more postoperatively. The factors affecting the postoperative hemodynamics in the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) were then evaluated. Results: The median number of days requiring vasoactive drug support postoperatively was three in 234 patients, while 118 (50.4%) patients required vasoactive drug support for three days or more postoperatively. The results of the multivariate analysis indicated more preoperative colloid use (odds ratio [OR]=1.834, confidence interval [CI]:1.265-2.659, P=0.001), intraoperative use of vasoactive drug (OR=4.174, CI:1.882-9.258, P<0.001), and more postoperative crystalloid solution input per unit of body weight per day (ml/kg/d) (OR=1.087, CI:1.062-1.112, P<0.001) were risk factors for predicting postoperative hemodynamic instability. The optimal cutoff point of postoperative crystalloid use were 42.37 ml/kg/d. Conclusion: Hemodynamic instability is a key issue for consideration in the perioperative period of pheochromocytoma. The amount of preoperative colloid use, the need for intraoperative vasoactive drugs, and postoperative crystalloid solution are risk factors for predicting postoperative hemodynamic instability (registration number: ChiCT2300071166).

Hepatorenal Syndrome Type 1: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a feared complication in patients with advanced cirrhosis and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While recognized as a distinct physiologic condition for well over one hundred years, a lack of objective diagnostic tests has made the diagnosis one of exclusion. Since 1979, multiple sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed. Though varying in detail, the principal intent of these criteria is to identify patients with severe, functional acute kidney injury that is unresponsive to volume resuscitation and exclude those with structural injury. However, accurate differential diagnosis remains challenging. Recently, multiple urinary biomarkers of kidney injury, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, have been studied as a means of objectively phenotyping etiologies of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis. Along with markers reflecting tubular functional integrity, including the fractional excretion of sodium, injury markers will likely be incorporated into future diagnostic criteria. Making an accurate diagnosis is critical, as therapeutic options exist for HRS but must be given in a timely manner and only to those patients likely to benefit. Terlipressin, an analog of vasopressin, is the first line of therapy for HRS in much of the world and has recently been approved for use in the United States. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal dosing strategy, metrics for titration, and the potential role of point-of-care ultrasound to help guide concurrent albumin administration.

Prospective randomized double-blind study to evaluate the superiority of Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in the management of the patient at renal risk undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (NOVACC trial).

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CS-AKI) affects up to 30% of patients, increasing morbidity and healthcare costs. This condition results from complex factors like ischemia-reperfusion injury and renal hemodynamic changes, often exacerbated by surgical procedures. Norepinephrine, commonly used in cardiac surgeries, may heighten the risk of CS-AKI. In contrast, vasopressin, a noncatecholaminergic agent, shows potential in preserving renal function by favorably affecting renal hemodynamic. Preliminary findings, suggest vasopressin could reduce the incidence of CS-AKI compared to norepinephrine. Additionally, vasopressin is linked to a lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, another factor contributing to longer hospital stays and higher costs. This study hypothesizes that vasopressin could effectively reduce CS-AKI occurrence and severity by optimizing renal perfusion during cardiac surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: The NOVACC trial (NCT05568160) is a multicenter, randomized, double blinded superiority-controlled trial testing the superiority of vasopressin over norepinephrine in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The primary composite end point is the occurrence of acute kidney injury and death. The secondary end points are neurological, cardiologic, digestive, and vasopressor related complications at day 7, day 30, day 90, hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, medico-economic costs at day 90. CONCLUSION: The NOVACC trial will assess the effectiveness of vasopressin in cardiac surgery with CPB in reducing acute kidney injury, mortality, and medical costs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05568160.

Comparison of Octreotide and Vasopressors as First-Line Treatment for Intraoperative Carcinoid Crisis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative carcinoid crisis is typically sudden onset of profound hypotension during operations on patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The crisis was thought to be due to massive release of hormones, and perioperative octreotide was recommended as a prophylaxis against the crisis and as first-line treatment. Recent studies show that octreotide does not prevent the crisis and that no massive release of hormones occurs. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that octreotide is not effective for treating the crisis. METHODS: A prospective carcinoid anesthesia database was analyzed for occurrences of crisis. Outcomes were compared between protocols when first-line therapy was bolus octreotide and when it was vasopressors without octreotide. Significance was determined by Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Among operations performed with octreotide as first-line treatment (n = 150), crisis occurred for 45 (30 %) patients, the median crisis duration was 6 min, 12 (27 %) patients had crises longer than 10 min, 42 patients (93 %) required subsequent vasopressor administration to resolve the crisis, and 3 (2 %) operations were aborted. Among operations performed with vasopressors as the first-line treatment (n = 195), crisis occurred for 49 (25 %) patients (p = 0.31), the median crisis duration was 3 min (p < 0.001), and no crisis lasted longer than 10 min (p = 0.001). Patients treated with vasopressors were less likely to have multiple crises and had a shorter total time in crisis, a shorter anesthesia time, and no aborted operations (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: First-line octreotide was ineffective treatment for carcinoid crisis, with patients requiring vasopressors to resolve the crisis, and many crises lasting longer than 10 min. First-line vasopressor treatment resulted in significantly shorter crisis durations, fewer crises and aborted operations, and shorter anesthesia times. Vasopressors should be used as first-line treatment for intraoperative crisis, and treatment guidelines should be changed.

Evaluation of terlipressin-related patient outcomes in hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury using point-of-care echocardiography.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment of hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), with terlipressin and albumin, provides survival benefits, but may be associated with cardiopulmonary complications. We analyzed the predictors of terlipressin response and mortality using point-of-care echocardiography (POC-Echo) and cardiac and renal biomarkers. APPROACH: Between December 2021 and January 2023, patients with HRS-AKI were assessed with POC-Echo and lung ultrasound within 6 hours of admission, at the time of starting terlipressin (48 h), and at 72 hours. Volume expansion was done with 20% albumin, followed by terlipressin infusion. Clinical data, POC-Echo data, and serum biomarkers were prospectively collected. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) was defined per 2020 criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients were enrolled (84% men, 59% alcohol-associated disease, mean MELD-Na 25±SD 5.6). A median daily dose of infused terlipressin was 4.3 (interquartile range: 3.9-4.6) mg/day; mean duration 6.4 ± SD 1.9 days; the complete response was in 62% and partial response in 11%. Overall mortality was 14% and 16% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Cutoffs for prediction of terlipressin nonresponse were cardiac variables [ratio of early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic tissue doppler velocity > 12.5 (indicating increased left filling pressures, C-statistic: 0.774), tissue doppler mitral velocity < 7 cm/s (indicating impaired relaxation; C-statistic: 0.791), > 20.5% reduction in cardiac index at 72 hours (C-statistic: 0.885); p < 0.001] and pretreatment biomarkers (CysC > 2.2 mg/l, C-statistic: 0.640 and N-terminal proBNP > 350 pg/mL, C-statistic: 0.655; p <0.050). About 6% of all patients with HRS-AKI and 26% of patients with CCM had pulmonary edema. The presence of CCM (adjusted HR 1.9; CI: 1.8-4.5, p = 0.009) and terlipressin nonresponse (adjusted HR 5.2; CI: 2.2-12.2, p <0.001) were predictors of mortality independent of age, sex, obesity, DM-2, etiology, and baseline creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: CCM and reduction in cardiac index, reliably predict terlipressin nonresponse. CCM is independently associated with poor survival in HRS-AKI.

Intraoperative Use of Phenylephrine versus Ephedrine and Postoperative Delirium: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of intraoperative hypotension with phenylephrine may impair cerebral perfusion through vasoconstriction, which has been linked to postoperative delirium. The hypothesis was that intraoperative administration of phenylephrine, compared to ephedrine, is associated with higher odds of postoperative delirium. METHODS: A total of 103,094 hospitalized adults undergoing general anesthesia for noncardiac, non-neurosurgical procedures between 2008 and 2020 at two tertiary academic healthcare networks in Massachusetts were included in this multicenter hospital registry study. The primary exposure was the administration of phenylephrine versus ephedrine during surgery, and the primary outcome was postoperative delirium within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for a priori defined confounding variables including patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedural factors including magnitude of intraoperative hypotension were applied. RESULTS: Between the two healthcare networks, 78,982 (76.6%) patients received phenylephrine, and 24,112 (23.4%) patients received ephedrine during surgery; 770 patients (0.8%) developed delirium within 7 days. The median (interquartile range) total intraoperative dose of phenylephrine was 1.0 (0.2 to 3.3) mg and 10.0 (10.0 to 20.0) mg for ephedrine. In adjusted analyses, the administration of phenylephrine, compared to ephedrine, was associated with higher odds of developing postoperative delirium within 7 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.71; and adjusted absolute risk difference, 0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3%; P = 0.015). A keyword and manual chart review-based approach in a subset of 45,465 patients further validated these findings (delirium incidence, 3.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.37; P < 0.001). Fractional polynomial regression analysis further indicated a dose-dependent effect of phenylephrine (adjusted coefficient, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.14; P = 0.013, per each µg/kg increase in the cumulative phenylephrine dose). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of phenylephrine compared to ephedrine during general anesthesia was associated with higher odds of developing postoperative delirium. Based on these data, clinical trials are warranted to determine whether favoring ephedrine over phenylephrine for treatment of intraoperative hypotension can reduce delirium after surgery.

Spinal decompression surgery may alleviate vasopressor-induced spinal hemorrhage and extravasation during acute cervical spinal cord injury in rats.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal injury often disrupts the supraspinal vasomotor pathways projecting to the thoracic sympathetic preganglionic neurons, leading to cardiovascular dysfunction. The current guideline is to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure at 85 to 90 mmHg using a vasopressor during the first week of the injury. Some studies have demonstrated that this treatment might be beneficial to alleviate secondary injury and improve neurological outcomes; however, elevation of blood pressure may exacerbate spinal hemorrhage, extravasation, and edema, exacerbating the initial injury. PURPOSE: The present study was designed to (1) examine whether vasopressor administration exacerbates spinal hemorrhage and extravasation; (2) evaluate whether spinal decompression surgery relieves vasopressor-induced spinal hemorrhage and extravasation. STUDY DESIGN: In vivo animal study. METHODS: Animals received a saline solution or a vasopressor (phenylephrine hydrochloride, 500 or 1000 µg/kg, 7 mL/kg/h) after mid-cervical contusion with or without spinal decompression (ie, incision of the dura and arachnoid mater). Spinal cord hemorrhage and extravasation were examined by expression of Evans blue within the spinal cord section. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that cervical spinal contusion significantly reduced the mean arterial blood pressure and induced spinal hemorrhage and extravasation. Phenylephrine infusion significantly elevated the mean arterial blood pressure to the preinjury level within 15 to 60 minutes postcontusion; however, spinal hemorrhage and extravasation were more extensive in animals that received phenylephrine than in those that received saline. Notably, spinal decompression mitigated spinal hemorrhage and extravasation in contused rats who received phenylephrine. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, although phenylephrine can prevent hypotension after cervical spinal injury, it also causes excess spinal hemorrhage and extravasation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Spinal decompressive surgery seemed to minimize the side effect of phenylephrine as vasopressor treatment during acute spinal cord injury.

Tight control of mean arterial pressure using a closed loop system for norepinephrine infusion after high-risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses frequently manually titrate norepinephrine to maintain a predefined mean arterial pressure (MAP) target after high-risk surgery. However, achieving this task is often suboptimal. We have developed a closed-loop vasopressor (CLV) controller to better maintain MAP within a narrow range. After ethical committee approval, fifty-three patients admitted to the ICU following high-risk abdominal surgery were randomized to CLV or manual norepinephrine titration. In both groups, the aim was to maintain MAP in the predefined target of 80-90 mmHg. Fluid administration was standardized in the two groups using an advanced hemodynamic monitoring device. The primary outcome of our study was the percentage of time patients were in the MAP target. Over the 2-hour study period, the percentage of time with MAP in target was greater in the CLV group than in the control group (median: IQR25-75: 80 [68-88]% vs. 42 [22-65]%), difference 37.2, 95% CI (23.0-49.2); p < 0.001). Percentage time with MAP under 80 mmHg (1 [0-5]% vs. 26 [16-75]%, p < 0.001) and MAP under 65 mmHg (0 [0-0]% vs. 0 [0-4]%, p = 0.017) were both lower in the CLV group than in the control group. The percentage of time with a MAP > 90 mmHg was not statistically different between groups. In patients admitted to the ICU after high-risk abdominal surgery, closed-loop control of norepinephrine infusion better maintained a MAP target of 80 to 90 mmHg and significantly decreased postoperative hypotensive when compared to manual norepinephrine titration.

Vasopressin in vasoplegic shock in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Vasoplegia, or vasoplegic shock, is a syndrome whose main characteristic is reducing blood pressure in the presence of a standard or high cardiac output. For the treatment, vasopressors are recommended, and the most used is norepinephrine. However, new drugs have been evaluated, and conflicting results exist in the literature. METHODS: This is a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis, written according to the recommendations of the PRISMA report. The SCOPUS, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases were used to select the scientific articles included in the study. Searches were conducted in December 2022 using the terms "vasopressin," "norepinephrine," "vasoplegic shock," "postoperative," and "surgery." Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. The endpoint associated with the study was efficiency in treating vasoplegic shock and reduced risk of death. RESULTS: In total, 2,090 articles were retrieved; after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, ten studies were selected to compose the present review. We found no significant difference when assessing the outcome mortality comparing vasopressin versus norepinephrine (odds ratio = 1.60; confidence interval 0.47-5.50), nor when comparing studies on vasopressin versus placebo. When we analyzed the length of hospital stay compared to the use of vasopressin and norepinephrine, we identified a shorter length of hospital stay in cases that used vasopressin; however, the meta-analysis did not demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the outcomes included in our study, it is worth noting that most studies showed that using vasopressin was safe and can be considered in managing postoperative vasoplegic shock.

Angiotensin II in liver transplantation (AngLT-1): protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Catecholamine vasopressors such as norepinephrine are the standard drugs used to maintain mean arterial pressure during liver transplantation. At high doses, catecholamines may impair organ perfusion. Angiotensin II is a peptide vasoconstrictor that may improve renal perfusion pressure and glomerular filtration rate, a haemodynamic profile that could reduce acute kidney injury. Angiotensin II is approved for vasodilatory shock but has not been rigorously evaluated for treatment of hypotension during liver transplantation. The objective is to assess the efficacy of angiotensin II as a second-line vasopressor infusion during liver transplantation. This trial will establish the efficacy of angiotensin II in decreasing the dose of norepinephrine to maintain adequate blood pressure. Completion of this study will allow design of a follow-up, multicentre trial powered to detect a reduction of organ injury in liver transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Eligible subjects are adults with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium Score ≥25 undergoing deceased donor liver transplantation. Subjects are randomised 1:1 to receive angiotensin II or saline placebo as the second-line vasopressor infusion. The study drug infusion is initiated on reaching a norepinephrine dose of 0.05 µg kg-1 min-1 and titrated per protocol. The primary outcome is the dose of norepinephrine required to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes include vasopressin or epinephrine requirement and duration of hypotension. Safety outcomes include incidence of thromboembolism within 48 hours of the end of surgery and severe hypertension. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed for all randomised subjects receiving the study drug. The total dose of norepinephrine will be compared between the two arms by a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (#20-30948). Results will be posted on ClinicalTrials.gov and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04901169.

Vasopressors to treat postoperative hypotension after adult noncardiac, non-obstetric surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hypotension is common after major surgery and is associated with patient harm. Vasopressors are commonly used to treat hypotension without clear evidence of benefit. We conducted a systematic review to better understand the use, impact, and rationale for vasopressor administration after noncardiac, non-obstetric surgery in adults. METHODS: We conducted a prospectively registered systematic review. Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDBASE, and MEDLINE were searched for RCTs and cohort studies of adult patients receiving vasopressors after noncardiac, non-obstetric surgery. Study quality was critically appraised by two investigators. Findings from the review were synthesised, but formal meta-analysis was not performed because of significant variability in study populations and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3201 articles were screened, of which seven RCTs, two prospective cohort studies, and 15 retrospective cohort studies were included in the analysis (24 in total). One study was graded as high quality, two as moderate quality, and the remaining 21 as low quality. Sixteen studies relied on clinical assessment alone to decide on therapeutic interventions. Vasodilation was the most common suggested physiological disturbance. The median proportion of patients receiving vasopressors was 42% (interquartile range: 11.5-74.7%). Norepinephrine was the most common vasopressor used. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supporting the use of vasopressors to treat postoperative hypotension is limited. Future research should focus on whether vasodilatation or other physiological disturbance is driving postoperative hypotension to allow rational decision-making.

Administration of magnesium sulphate does not prevent post-reperfusion syndrome but is necessary during living donor liver transplantation.

Severe hemodynamic instability is observed during portal vein de-clamping in the form of post-reperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation. The protective effect of magnesium on inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injuries of various organs is evident, but its role in the prevention of post-reperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation is not clear. We investigated the effect of magnesium sulphate on the incidence of post-reperfusion syndrome during living donor liver transplantation. The secondary outcomes were the requirement of vasopressor boluses and levels of serum magnesium, lactate and serum C-reactive protein. Seventy living donor liver transplant recipients were randomized into a magnesium (M) group (n = 35) or normal saline (N) group (n = 35). The patients in group M received 35 mg/kg of magnesium sulphate, 30 minutes after the beginning of the anhepatic phase, and patients in group N received normal saline. The incidence of post-reperfusion syndrome in group M and group N was 34.29% and 40%, respectively, with no significant difference. The requirement for rescue vasopressor boluses and levels of C-reactive protein and lactate were also comparable between the two groups. However, the incidence of hypomagnesemia at the end of surgery was significantly higher in group N (37.1% vs. 14.28%, p = 0.027). Magnesium does not appear to prevent post-reperfusion syndrome. However, hypomagnesemia is more frequently seen during liver transplantation. Hence, serum magnesium should be routinely monitored and administered during liver transplantation.

Hemodynamic failure and graft dysfunction after lung transplant: A possible clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences.

INTRODUCTION: The postoperative hemodynamic management after lung transplant (LUTX) is guided by limited evidence. We aimed to describe and evaluate risk factors and outcomes of postoperative vasoactive support of LUTX recipients. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive adult LUTX, two cohorts were identified: (1) patients needing prolonged vasoactive support (>12 h from ICU admission) (VASO+); (2) or not (VASO-). Postoperative hemodynamic characteristics were thoroughly analyzed. Risk factors and outcomes of VASO+ versus VASO- cohorts were assessed by multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients were included (86 (62%) VASO+ versus 52 (38%) VASO-). Vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) were used in the first postoperative days (vasoactive inotropic score at 12 h: 6 [4-12]), while inodilators (dobutamine, levosimendan) later. Length of vasoactive support was 3 [2-4] days. Independent predictors of vasoactive use were: LUTX indication different from cystic fibrosis (p = .003), higher Oto score (p = .020), longer cold ischemia time (p = .031), but not preoperative cardiac catheterization. VASO+ patients showed concomitant hemodynamic and graft impairment, with longer mechanical ventilation (p = .010), higher primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade at 72 h (PGD grade > 0 65% vs. 31%, p = .004, OR 4.2 [1.54-11.2]), longer ICU (p < .001) and hospital stay (p = .013). Levosimendan as a second-line inodilator appeared safe. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoactive support is frequently necessary after LUTX, especially in recipients of grafts of lesser quality. Postoperative hemodynamic dysfunction requiring vasopressor support and graft dysfunction may represent a clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences. Further studies may elucidate if this represents a possible treatable condition.

Intraoperative Versus Postoperative Hydroxocobalamin for Vasoplegic Shock in Cardiothoracic Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Hydroxocobalamin inhibits nitric oxide pathways contributing to vasoplegic shock in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative versus postoperative application of hydroxocobalamin for vasoplegic shock in patients undergoing CPB. DESIGN: This was a historic cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a quaternary academic cardiovascular surgery program. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB were participants in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Hydroxocobalamin (5 g) intravenously over 15 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The treatment groups were assigned based on the receipt location of hydroxocobalamin (ie, intensive care unit [ICU] versus operating room [OR]). The primary outcome was vasopressor-free days in the first 14 days after CPB. Of the 112 patients included, 37 patients received hydroxocobalamin in the OR and 75 in the ICU. Patients in the OR group were younger than those in the ICU group (57.5 v 63.9 years, p = 0.007), with statistically similar American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. The mean CPB duration was 3.4 hours in the OR group and 2.9 hours in the ICU group (p = 0.09). In both groups, the norepinephrine-equivalent dose of vasopressors at hydroxocobalamin was 0.27 µg/kg/min. Days alive and free of vasopressors were not different between the OR and ICU groups (estimated difference 0.48 [95% CI -1.76-2.72], p = 0.67). The odds of postoperative renal failure, mesenteric ischemia, ICU, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality were also similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A difference in vasopressor-free days after CPB was not found between patients who received hydroxocobalamin intraoperatively versus postoperatively for vasoplegic shock.

Outcomes of patients with hepatorenal syndrome undergoing liver transplantation in the era of terlipressin.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of terlipressin in improving pre-liver transplant renal function in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) has been well documented, however, its impact on post-transplant renal function remains poorly described. This study aims to describe the impact of HRS and terlipressin on post-liver transplant renal function and survival. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective, observational study was conducted to identify post-transplant outcomes of patients diagnosed with HRS undergoing liver transplant (HRS cohort) and those undergoing transplant for non-HRS, non-hepatocellular carcinoma cirrhotic indications (comparator cohort) between January 1997 and March 2020. The primary outcome was serum creatinine at 180 days post-liver transplant. Other renal outcomes and overall survival were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: 109 patients with HRS and 502 comparator patients underwent liver transplant. The comparator cohort was younger than the HRS cohort (53 vs. 57 years, P < 0.001). The median creatinine at day 180 post-transplant was higher in the HRS transplant group (119 µmol/L vs. 103 µmol/L, P < 0.001), however, this association lost significance following multivariate analysis. Seven patients (7%) in the HRS cohort received a combined liver-kidney transplant. There was no significant difference in the 12-month post-transplant survival between the two groups (94% vs. 94%, P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Patients with HRS treated with terlipressin who subsequently undergo liver transplantation have post-transplant renal and survival outcomes comparable to patients transplanted for cirrhosis without HRS. This study supports the practice of liver-only transplant in this cohort and the reservation of renal allografts for those who have primary renal disease.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system dynamics after targeted blood pressure control using angiotensin II or norepinephrine in cardiac surgery: mechanistic randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in vasoplegia after cardiac surgery remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that, compared with norepinephrine, infusion of angiotensin II titrated to achieve similar mean arterial pressure (MAP) would suppress plasma renin concentration (PRC) while maintaining aldosterone levels. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, subjects received either an infusion of angiotensin II or norepinephrine to maintain MAP 70-80 mm Hg from induction of anaesthesia. We compared PRC, aldosterone, dipeptidyl peptidase-3, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity between treatment groups, before surgery, on ICU admission, and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: In 60 patients (11.7% female; mean age 68 yr [11 yr]), norepinephrine increased median PRC at ICU admission (median difference [MD] 46 [inter-quartile range, IQR, 3-88] µU ml-1; P<0.001) but angiotensin II did not (MD -3 [IQR -62 to 35] µU ml-1; P=0.36). Aldosterone levels increased with both. The aldosterone:PRC ratio did not change with norepinephrine (MD -0.01 [IQR -0.14 to 0.03] µU ml-1 per ng dl-1, P=0.76) but increased with angiotensin II (MD 0.05 [IQR 0.004-0.26] µU ml-1 per ng dl-1, P<0.001). The upper quartile of PRC before surgery was associated with higher vasopressor requirements when norepinephrine was used to maintain MAP, but not angiotensin II. Dipeptidyl peptidase-3 levels and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activities were similar at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II suppressed renin release while maintaining aldosterone levels compared with norepinephrine. Higher plasma renin concentration before surgery was associated with greater vasopressor requirement for norepinephrine, but not angiotensin II. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12621000195853 23/02/2021.